Jump to content

Mafia 3.0 [Forum Game]


Sikslik7

Recommended Posts

Hmm. I guess those are valid points.

 

I'd change my vote, except I was never able to vote in the first place.

I have to admit I laughed a little on the inside when I read this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bnus can you give me some reasons why I should believe you are Pro-town? There is no reason to mull over this, because the mafia would know that you're pro-town anyway. 

Ok here are my reasons

1. Why would I be Mafia two games in a row. 

2. I wasn't a very good mafia last game and I am one of the reasons the game fell to shambles

3. I am offering advice and my insight more then I did last game.

4. I am not trying to figure out anyones roles and have PMed nobody asking for them. All I did was PM Prime that I am a civie and give the same Peanut evidence. I also PMed Peanut saying I am going to destroy the mafia.

5. I betrayed everyones trust last game(since I was mafia) I would be pretty dumb to even try to be mafia again with the reputation I earned myself.

6. I always use I

7. This is my favorite number

8. I have barely participated in the game and only in these forums if I was mafia I would try to figure out everyones role. 

9. This is the best reason. If I was mafia you would be dead by now and I would  tell everone I killed you myself. Death by stabbing of course *stabs you with reasons*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

       And the citizens of the fabulous city of 343i cast their votes. Despite only 13 votes being cast for a candidate *cough* Yang *cough*, 14 votes were in the ballot box. No one thought anything of it, and applauded the open city council style voting system. No secrecy, every vote, word, or action of others could sway the vote. hey liked it for some odd reason. The Newcomer read out the results.

 

 

Drum-roll please:

 

 

 

 

 

Tyrone King: 0

 

Total Mayh3m: 0

 

Aiden Pearce: 0

 

Yang Xiao Lang: 0

 

Null: 6

 

Unease P34nut: 8

 

 

 

It seems we have someone headed to the chopping block. I will give Unease P34nut 24 hours to give me his final words, and the same amount of time to the Jail Keeper if they wish to activate their powers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait what no!!!

 

I'm a civilian this round! The point with getting killed by food and me being food has nothing to do with each other! Cookies don't even contain nuts (mostly).

Also the scenes do not contain clues as stated in the previous game of Mafia. This isn't a valid point.

For the love of god don't murder me as you will lose a civillian and let the Mafia get one step closer to getting the upper hand again.

 

I'll try to upload a picture of my PM's.

BdapaR3.jpg

Here it is!

 

I don't wanna start pointing fingers yet but this looks exactly the same trickery Bnus applied to you last game.

Also if I were to be Mafia wouldn't I have changed my vote to Yang to get rid of another member and get a step closer to victory?

Yang is being protected by Bnus like he protected the Mafia in the previous games. Mark my word, one of them is Mafia!


Ok here are my reasons

1. Why would I be Mafia two games in a row. 

2. I wasn't a very good mafia last game and I am one of the reasons the game fell to shambles

3. I am offering advice and my insight more then I did last game.

4. I am not trying to figure out anyones roles and have PMed nobody asking for them. All I did was PM Prime that I am a civie and give the same Peanut evidence. I also PMed Peanut saying I am going to destroy the mafia.

5. I betrayed everyones trust last game(since I was mafia) I would be pretty dumb to even try to be mafia again with the reputation I earned myself.

6. I always use I

7. This is my favorite number

8. I have barely participated in the game and only in these forums if I was mafia I would try to figure out everyones role. 

9. This is the best reason. If I was mafia you would be dead by now and I would  tell everone I killed you myself. Death by stabbing of course *stabs you with reasons*

 

1. Wouldn't that point apply to me too?

2. You were the best of the Mafia team

3.Last game your insightful advice was meant to confuse pro-town and tear them apart

4.You did. That was the Hey PM in my PM's. I also replied that you got the wrong one and to guess again

5.Please read 3. again

6-9. gibberish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that I am too late.

 

Let this be a leeson to you all.

Do not blindly trust Bnus anylonger.

 

Hell be upon the followers of this man! HELL I TELL YOU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait what no!!!

 

I'm a civilian this round! The point with getting killed by food and me being food has nothing to do with each other! Cookies don't even contain nuts (mostly).

Also the scenes do not contain clues as stated in the previous game of Mafia. This isn't a valid point.

For the love of god don't murder me as you will lose a civillian and let the Mafia get one step closer to getting the upper hand again.

 

I'll try to upload a picture of my PM's.

BdapaR3.jpg

Here it is!

 

I don't wanna start pointing fingers yet but this looks exactly the same trickery Bnus applied to you last game.

Also if I were to be Mafia wouldn't I have changed my vote to Yang to get rid of another member and get a step closer to victory?

Yang is being protected by Bnus like he protected the Mafia in the previous games. Mark my word, one of them is Mafia!

 

1. Wouldn't that point apply to me too?

2. You were the best of the Mafia team

3.Last game your insightful advice was meant to confuse pro-town and tear them apart

4.You did. That was the Hey PM in my PM's. I also replied that you got the wrong one and to guess again

5.Please read 3. again

6-9. gibberish

 

 

Wait what no!!!

 

I'm a civilian this round! The point with getting killed by food and me being food has nothing to do with each other! Cookies don't even contain nuts (mostly).

Also the scenes do not contain clues as stated in the previous game of Mafia. This isn't a valid point.

For the love of god don't murder me as you will lose a civillian and let the Mafia get one step closer to getting the upper hand again.

 

I'll try to upload a picture of my PM's.

BdapaR3.jpg

Here it is!

 

I don't wanna start pointing fingers yet but this looks exactly the same trickery Bnus applied to you last game.

Also if I were to be Mafia wouldn't I have changed my vote to Yang to get rid of another member and get a step closer to victory?

Yang is being protected by Bnus like he protected the Mafia in the previous games. Mark my word, one of them is Mafia!

 

1. Wouldn't that point apply to me too?

2. You were the best of the Mafia team

3.Last game your insightful advice was meant to confuse pro-town and tear them apart

4.You did. That was the Hey PM in my PM's. I also replied that you got the wrong one and to guess again

5.Please read 3. again

6-9. gibberish

I'm not convinced either, but this needs to be done for now. I promise... PM me and I'll use you as an Ally. I have my own reasons for voting to kil you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not convinced either, but this needs to be done for now. I promise... PM me and I'll use you as an Ally. I have my own reasons for voting to kil you.

 

So you're killing an ally because of a grudge?

Or are you aiding the Mafia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bnus kills people that he sees as a personal threat, which is not determined by their role, but how they play. Then, he targets you based on the importance of your role. Though he puts emphasis on those to categories, they aren't necessarily the first to go. Why? In chronological order the personal threats die first, and minor roles proceed to die. Finally, the major roles are taken out. The latter deaths often occur in tandem with the personal threats category, which can be expected for several reasons. 

 

List: Threat--Civilian--charity--Major roles who aren't a threat.Charity are those he wants to allow a fair cushion of time to play, since they are new to the game. (and a bit of randomization) 

 

It is hard to determine if the inconsistencies in the chronology of this list are due to the lack of viable evidence to convince others, or his own uncertainty. His uncertainty is counteracted by his dead-set playing style. He doesn't change his stance on a decision and professedly his known outlook on a situation. This allows his uncertainty to decay, which allows his decisions to be based on convincing appeal, such as in Unease's case. 

 

In short, he targets people based on the evidence necessary to convince others, and how they will effect him. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...