Ash

Name: Ash Weapon(s): Royal fencing blade, used like a claymore. Appearance: Blonde hair, shoulder length, blue eyes, tanned skin, 5'7, lightweight. Skills and Powers: Smart, capable of analysing tactics and strategies, skilled swordsman. Bio: Very soft spoken, shy. Grew up in an orphanage, usually afraid of combat. Gets serious when friends are in danger. I really enjoy this series, I hope you will continue to write it.

Sprint is a great mechanic, and the fact that it's a built in thing, not an armor ability anymore is awesome. I mean, I really like it when my super soldier spartan can actually run instead of always fast walking. While I'm not saying that 343i keeping sprint will fix Halo 5, but it is definitely the right choice. And for those who think that they should revert to "old school, outdated" Halo, you realise that you can simply ask for a sprint free playlist, instead of just pointlessly whining about how Halo 5 should be sprint free. Thank you for sharing your opinion though, it was fun shooting it down.

Well, I think that have 2 seperate playlist is a good idea, but I have to disagree with the old and new idea. Halo 3 had it best with a social playlist for casual players that just want to have fun, and a ranked playlist for more skilled players to test their mettle against other skilled players. I'm not saying that have a classic playlist is a bad idea, but dedicating half of your 2015 games' multiplayer to an older game style is a waste. Halo has been evolving for almost 13 years, and having a small taste of classic halo is fine, but Halo 5 is going to be about Halo 5. Also considering the fact that Halo 2 Anniversary's multiplayer is exactly the same as it was 10 years ago, and that it's on xbox one, that's all the classic you could want, plus you have the other 3 halo games you can play.

I have this gun, and I agree that it's great, and the only scout rifle that rivals it would be the Vision of Confluence. I was very disappointed by the field scout upgrade only adding 6 bullets to the clip totalling 27. I was expecting at least over 30. But the fast reload does make up for that I suppose. P.S ~ I didn't know about the chest finding aspect, I'll have to try that out.

This is good to know. And also, not everyone has unlimited data plans, so having a potential 65 gb download might take up most of someones monthly limit.

Definitely getting MCC, Advanced Warfare, Pokemon OR, Kingdom Hearts 2.5 Remix and getting into the Halo 5 Guardians beta.

Welcome back!

Welcome to the forum!

I would say he's not, but I didn't like him so I'm alright if he magically is.

Well, I'd say it's in the past, it's a bonus from 343i. So lets just look to Halo 4 in the MCC.

Consider the Elites feelings for a moment, tossed aside in Halo 4, I don't think they'll come back for Guardians. But I did like their easy to hit heads

I think it's a great idea, a way of showing your Halo history in game. Though I wonder how they would do it.. 1 game per armor piece?

Infinity for a long, long...

I really enjoyed Halo 3 ODST's for the challenge, but i prefered Halo Reach's for the customization.

I would love to see ODST brought onto current gen, and Reach would be nice too. Although a new Halo Wars game would take precedence in my opinion

Halo 3 had a more diverse gameplay experience in terms of campaign, multiplayer and other modes. Reasons: ~ Halo 3's Campaign took you places and didn't keep you in the same area for a long period of time. While Reach's ended up revisiting previous missions. ~ Halo 3's Multiplayer had both social and ranked playlists, whereas Reach was all social and only had a few unpopular MLG playlist from time to time. ~ Reach's forge was far superior to 3's in terms of content and tools, that being said 3's forge was much to begin with. To clunky and frustrating. ~ Reach having Firefight gives it a good advantage considering the fact it wasn't invented until after 3 came out. But all in all I must concur that Halo 3 does surpass Halo Reach in terms of quality gameplay experience. Reach is prettier, but graphics alone can't carry a game like Reach by itself.

If I remember correctly, Destiny wasn't meant to go to Xbox consoles from the beginning, but were added in later in the dev process. Also considering that Bungie's previous hit "Halo" was an Xbox exclusive, that PS owners could never have. So it's more like Destiny has normal release on Playstation and Xbox gets a staggered edition. Unfair, but not much you can do against a deal between Sony and Activision. That being said it is a little unfair to xbox players to pay the same and get less.. From my experience though, Dust Palace isn't anything special, and I don't think that the Dark Below exclusive strike will be much more entertaining. (Then again I'm not looking forward to the whole expansion since it's Hive based.) All in all, I think Activision and Bungie should show more equality between the consoles.