WonderWombat Posted October 22, 2012 Report Share Posted October 22, 2012 Sorry dude, but the truth hurts sometimes. If it makes you feel better I'm about 50/50 on the multiplayer. But this is cause I'm not that big a fan of Halo multiplayer. After I say that though I won't be off the multiplayer ever. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tallgeese Posted October 22, 2012 Report Share Posted October 22, 2012 Again, hypocritical statements.... "played the game and then decided that it [iNSERT WORD HERE]" Play the game and THEN decide whether it was good, Christ. People like you make me sick... Well I for one have played the game, the ENTIRE campaign. And it made me feel like I was playing Halo CE all over again for the very first time. It was new and refreshing, it was fun and never lacking. I have yet to play a new build of the War Games besides my time at SDCC, but there War Games was fun and felt familiar but new. A lot has changed since SDCC, and I am sure some will change post launch. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuggedCrunkster Posted October 26, 2012 Report Share Posted October 26, 2012 Well I for one have played the game, the ENTIRE campaign. And it made me feel like I was playing Halo CE all over again for the very first time. It was new and refreshing, it was fun and never lacking. I have yet to play a new build of the War Games besides my time at SDCC, but there War Games was fun and felt familiar but new. A lot has changed since SDCC, and I am sure some will change post launch. How were you able to play the campaign before release? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o MERCiLiSS Posted November 1, 2012 Report Share Posted November 1, 2012 Some of the Spartan IV's armor looks like Power Ranger/Transformer esque. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tallgeese Posted November 1, 2012 Report Share Posted November 1, 2012 How were you able to play the campaign before release? Buddy of mine is the manager of the loacl gamestop and they got their copies a few weeks ago...so we played Co-Op legendary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tails Posted November 1, 2012 Report Share Posted November 1, 2012 Halo 4 is going to be quite different from Reach It's good that you read the books, it really starts giving you an idea about how the game will go. As well, metacritic has a 90/100 on Halo 4 right now, so it's obviously not ruined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tallgeese Posted November 1, 2012 Report Share Posted November 1, 2012 Halo 4 is going to be quite different from Reach It's good that you read the books, it really starts giving you an idea about how the game will go. As well, metacritic has a 90/100 on Halo 4 right now, so it's obviously not ruined And those are the primary critics...once all of the smaller critics release theirs I am sure Halo 4 will sit at a 95/100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tails Posted November 1, 2012 Report Share Posted November 1, 2012 Yea, and here is a good quote Welcome back, Halo. It's been a long, long five years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SykoWolf Posted November 2, 2012 Report Share Posted November 2, 2012 You see some people will always have an issue with change, but change is great. Im sure many of you had heard this on a certain Vidoc..... Evolution not Revolution..... If Halo never changed, it wouldnt be as good as it is now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killerdude1635 Posted November 2, 2012 Report Share Posted November 2, 2012 You see some people will always have an issue with change, but change is great. Im sure many of you had heard this on a certain Vidoc..... Evolution not Revolution..... If Halo never changed, it wouldnt be as good as it is now Change IS good, but too much change at one time is bad, Halo 4 IS too much change at one time. They really should have taken it a bit slower... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra1117 Posted November 2, 2012 Report Share Posted November 2, 2012 Change IS good, but too much change at one time is bad, Halo 4 IS too much change at one time. They really should have taken it a bit slower... Halo is just enough change for the series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hᴜᴍᴘsᴛʏʟᴇs Posted November 2, 2012 Report Share Posted November 2, 2012 What people don't understand is that others will forever be entitled to their own opinions. ...I just wish that closed minds came with closed mouths... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Talk Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 Change IS good, but too much change at one time is bad, Halo 4 IS too much change at one time. They really should have taken it a bit slower... People often complain of slow change. Halo has enough change considering its a new company taking on a new trilogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeosierra616 Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 I just can't understand how somebody can deem a game a failure before even playing it... Halo 2 was a pretty radical change from CE, as was 3 from 2, etc... no 2 games have played the same in the series lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra1117 Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 If the reviews are any indication, Halo has a LONG way to go before it dies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realitykid Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 Said it before, I'll say it again. If there isn't any change at all, then we'd just be playing the same old game over and over again. That would be extremely boring after awhile. To say that, because Halo 4 has changed so much, the entire Halo series is doomed is just false. It's a new game, which is marking the beginning of a whole new trilogy. Ya, if there wasn't any real major changes in this game from the last few, I wouldn't want to play it. There would be very little to set this game apart from all the past Halo titles. And Halo 4 needs to be apart from those. It is not a continuation of a trilogy, it's the start of a new trilogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuggedCrunkster Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 What people don't understand is that others will forever be entitled to their own opinions. ...I just wish that closed minds came with closed mouths... Amen brother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killerdude1635 Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 I just can't understand how somebody can deem a game a failure before even playing it... Halo 2 was a pretty radical change from CE, as was 3 from 2, etc... no 2 games have played the same in the series lol I just can't understand how somebody can deem a game a success before even playing it... Funny how that works huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epicnoah51 Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 all of you who are saying that 343 isnt made for halo or isnt made of people who love halo are wrong, look at 343i. they are named after a character of a friggin halo game. halo 4 is one of the first games in a new era of gaming. its going to be evoloutionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now