Crysis 3 graphics compared to Halo 4 and GOW 3

[Adam91]

 

Thought that Halo 4 or Gears of war 3 had the best graphics? Well think again as they might be getting kicked of their throne as Crysis 3 may be taking the lead.

 

More details below

 

Source:

Examiner

 

 

In an interview with VideoGamer on Tuesday, Cevat Yerli talked a little bit about the graphics of the upcoming multiplatform title, “Crysis 3.” The CEO of Crytek boasts that no other Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 video game, not even “Halo” or “Gears of War,” look as good technically as the first-person shooter on consoles.

 

 

"No game will ever look technically better than Crysis 3 on these consoles, flat out. Most games are not even anywhere near Crysis 2 technically. I'm not talking about art style – art is subjective – but the pure fact of what we have been cramming in with Crysis 2 on Xbox [360] and PlayStation [3], I've yet to see a game do that still today.

 

Any day I will take a battle against Gears and Halo, whatever, the amount of data we put in and the detail level is far superior. With Crysis 3 we're pushing that to another level, but the PC is just two levels beyond."

 

View slideshow:

‘Crysis 3’ graphics compared to ‘Halo’ and ‘Gears of War’

 

“Crysis 3” is currently being developed by Crytek Frankfurt, the same studio responsible for the previous games in the series in addition to the original “Far Cry.” Crytek UK (previously known as Free Radical Design, the studio behind “Haze” and “TimeSplitters”) worked on the multiplayer portion of the video game.

 

“Crysis 3” is slated to come out for the PC, Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 platforms in North America on Feb. 19, 2013. You can pre-order the first-person shooter in the following link: “Crysis 3”

View full article

[PostalFruitcake]

To run optimal crysis 3 it says you must have an asus 7970 lol!

[Iɴsɪɢɴɪᴀ]

Am I the only one who has noticed that the crisis suit actually resembles what the spartans undersuit would look like if you took off the armor? Think about it.

[Chase-S201]

Lol it does. Crysisit is an okay game. But they're kinda meh.

[Twinreaper]

Crysis 2 had superior graphics to GoW and Halo 4, not sure what the article author was thinking...

 

Crysis 3 is using an improved version of Cryengine, version 3.4.3...no pun intended there...that is the actual version number now..lmao. Crysis 3 will be hard to beat at any time, or even any version of Cryengine for that matter. The only engine that can compete or even start to beat it out is UDK.

[haloman 2]

never played the game but yes i did notice that the armor is like that of spartans but the graphics look sick and wasome!!!!!!!

[Flippant Sol]

GRAPHICS LOOK LIKE BATTLEFIELD THIS IS CRAP!!!

[WagonMasterGeneral]

I think crysis is intresting, but i prefer halo. Halo is one of the only games with decent map making and custom games, and the matchmaking is far from lacking.

[A71william]

Despite them being new; Halo 4's graphics seem old...

[Israel Lopez Maldonado]

Some words of enlightment for everyone: No PC Game released today needing today's latest video card (I don't keep up with it anymore, but it must be the NVidia 680?), will look better than MGS Ground Zeroes on Xbox 360 and Ps3, with their 2006 and 2007 hardware, using Fox Engine. You thought CryEngine was so advanced? Think again. I remember when the makers of Crysis said Crysis 1 would never be on Xbox and PS3 because they couldn't handle those graphics, and we saw Crysis 1 come out on Xbox after Crysis 2 came out on Xbox, looking practically as good as the PC Version, and now Crysis 3 is here looking light years ahead of Crysis 1 on PC. I don't know what all the fuss about Crysis graphics were back then in 2008. I own an Alienware laptop from 2008 with a 9800GTX card and it was able to max out Crysis on Very High back in 2008 at over 720p with a 30+ Framerate most of the time, and I considered many Xbox 360 and Ps3 games to look better, including Gears of War and Metal Gear Solid 4(except for its crappy textures and odd character animation). As you can see I stayed with my 2008 Alienware laptop and haven't bought a new one since then (having the money) and simply switched to console gaming. I did this after I saw Crysis 2 come out on PC, and it looked better than Crysis 1, my Alienware 2008 Laptop was still able to max it out at high resolutions with a better framerate than Crysis 1, so I decided that PC game developers are just not efficient using the hardware available. I have a desktop computer with an NVidia 280GTX that I bought around the time Skyrim came out to be able to max it out, but I haven't bought anything after that card and no longer game on the computer, and Skyrim looks just as good on consoles, and more recently Dead Space 3. It doesn't make sense having to upgrade your video card every year and your processor every 2 for the minimal advances PC games make in graphics, but the insane requirements they seem to artificially bump probably to make you buy more expensive hardware. If I was going to keep up with PC Gaming, I would have had to buy a new Alienware Laptop every 3 years to be able to max out the latest games. When it comes to Xbox and Ps3, I just bought each console once for less than one fourth the cost of the Alienware laptop, and they are still going after 7(Xbox) and 6(Ps3) years. By the way, don't look as Halo 4 as the best graphics among all consoles and PC, simply look at 343 Industries and their work. Compare Halo 4 to Halo 3, ODST, Halo Reach and Halo Anniversary, 343 is light years ahead of Bungie when it comes to graphics. I have no doubt Halo 5 on the next Xbox will look just as good as MGS5/Ground Zeroes, if not better due to being on a new console. I still cant believe how amazing Ground Zeroes look on Ps3 and Xbox 360: It would be amazing just if it was Ps4 or Next Xbox, so I have no idea what would Hideo Kojima be able to pull off on the next consoles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5IVOs5Pxh8