You children make me laugh. What happens in this game has no bearing on me. I have no bounds, and no limits. In a game where all proof is falsifiable, I really have no reason to hold back my suspicions. Video chatting, and whatever JL writes are the only CERTIFIABLE proof we have. If my decisions aren't based on those 2 things, then I am only blatantly accusing people of things.
Do you really think I trust my use of psychology? No.. It's a game, but the more I get to play with you people, the more reliable it becomes.
What makes a good game like this are two sturdy structures: The structure where few accesses for proof exist- where we rely on intuition and belief to make decisions- where we know there IS a way to attain information that is almost as good as proof; we think we attain it but we get shut down...
and then we have the allusive structure of fact(JL's posts): Looking at his lists, his announcements, and his stories. We get morsels of truth that keep us from going insane.
-A person loses when they can't interpret the truth, nor establish a belief system(system of trust based on incomplete evidence). It's like real life... Can you win at life?