daddyxx23 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 keeping armor abilities = fail of a game keeping more of a credit system with no skill ranking system = fail of a game making the game simple with no armor abilities = success making the game simple with only ability pick ups suck as invisabilty and over shield= success making the game a skill based ranking system = success you can not disagree with statistics , you may have thought reach was good but then you never played halo 2 or 3. the community speaks for it self as the community exploded as halo 3 came out but completely went straight down hill as halo reach arrived. ( Halo 3 is on a 77 months scale and halo reach is on a 15 month scale. which makes some of these statistics really embarrassing for reach . check out the link.) what do you think halo 4 should be more like ? halo 3 or Halo Reach? check it out http://www.bungie.net/stats/reach/online.aspx 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaxx Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 i voted Reach and Reach was more successful than Halo 3, look at the sales and Scores Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZB-85 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 So you mainly you want Halo 3, and nothing to do with Reach. I personally like Reach and Halo 3, If they included a little of both that would be great. But, I really would like more of Reach than Halo 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddyxx23 Posted April 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 you guys are ***n dumb and this game is going to be **** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZB-85 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 Why? I do not see how we are dumb. I truly do like Reach and hope that the ranking and credit system are in Halo 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaxx Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 you guys are ***n dumb and this game is going to be **** that what you said is totally out of line, we can have our own opinions and no one has the right to say we're dumb because of it, and in your comment, you are dumb for saying it 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddyxx23 Posted April 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 ok im out of line but i just want this game to take skil and be popular for a long time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZB-85 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 Trust me. It will be a very popular game, it might even knock Reach down half or more. We just need to trust what 343 Industries is going to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carts Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 i feel like gameplay wise, Reach did better then Halo 3 (after TU). Super Slayer feels a lot like Halo 2, which in my opinion is the most competitive Halo and had the best gameplay. Halo 3 was slightly disapointing for me but was okay overall. However, I wish that Halo 4 has the things OP has mentionned like no armor abilities and a visible ranking system. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShockGazm Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 you guys are ***n dumb and this game is going to be **** 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Biggles Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 ok im out of line but i just want this game to take skil and be popular for a long time Reach took skill, just people don't like change and are like "ZOMG REACHS SUCKS WITH BLOOM AND THE DMR" and so people quit. Make it like halo 2 and halo 3 then, that's your choice, i'll buy it, but i like the reach feel. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaxx Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 Reach took skill, just people don't like change and are like "ZOMG REACHS SUCKS WITH BLOOM AND THE DMR" and so people quit. Make it like halo 2 and halo 3 then, that's your choice, i'll buy it, but i like the reach feel. same here Biggles, great minds do think alike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest deathabove1 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 I think they should keep the ranking system abilities and a lot more from reach but also add some from halo 3 like pick up armor abilities and get rid of armor lock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Code50 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 Reach was alright but i really loved Halo 3 but when it comes to stuff like weapons Halo 4 should be like 3 because it continues from that. Halo Reach was a prequel that took place before Halo CE. So for example something like the health bar might be like Halo 3 because you are using Chief's armor and the other Spartans have a different type. Dr. Halsey purposely gave Chief the "real" armor for Spartans and just gave the rest of them normal armor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeRusch117 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 Reach was almost an instant let down to me 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeRusch117 Posted April 2, 2012 Report Share Posted April 2, 2012 It should be like 3 because to me that is the best game in the series. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Hunter Honor Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 To be honest, i liked Halo 3 alot more so it should be in that direction. Id love to have a few new aspects to the game play, maybe a few traits similar to Reach, i never really liked the Covenant speaking English. Its a little to convenient that the alien invaders know English, a lot of things would have to happen for the international earthling language to makes its way out into the far reaches of space. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddyxx23 Posted April 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 i just believe halo reach never reallly made the breakthrough that halo 3 did. and didnt make enough of an impact on gaming halo 3 did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuko 'Zarhamee Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 To be honest, i liked Halo 3 alot more so it should be in that direction. Id love to have a few new aspects to the game play, maybe a few traits similar to Reach, i never really liked the Covenant speaking English. Its a little to convenient that the alien invaders know English, a lot of things would have to happen for the international earthling language to makes its way out into the far reaches of space. The covenant have been spying on the humans for a long time and grunts learn different languages quickly. They also trained many elites because you can't crack an enemy coded transmission if you don't know the language. That's why the Covenant spoke English in the other Halo games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Hunter Honor Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 The covenant have been spying on the humans for a long time and grunts learn different languages quickly. They also trained many elites because you can't crack an enemy coded transmission if you don't know the language. That's why the Covenant spoke English in the other Halo games. i guess.........just seams a little too fishy........ill accept that i guess but only for the elites, bruits and profits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crmeto Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 Keep it like reach so you can have the best of both if they ad dual weild. Why? because halo reach can recreate halo 3's multiplayer just without the dual weild... thats what i would do... because you can satisfy more people that way. Halo Rules! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Code50 Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 i guess.........just seams a little too fishy........ill accept that i guess but only for the elites, bruits and profits. Why not for Grunts? Grunts are the smartest ones in the whole Covenant. That is mostly why they are there but i don't think Halo 4 would have the Covenant like Brutes, Grunts, Profits (they are all dead), and etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenney 303 Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Sadly Reach multiplayer was nothing like Halo 3, the problem with it was the weapons and the armour abilities, The armour abilities made it so if you went to splatter someone they would lock up and and kill you, and the weapons were no good for long range as they had bloom, so to shoot accurately you had to slow down thus letting them run to cover. The KEY to multiplayer is to have every player as equal as possible in terms of movement and ability, Look at Halo 3 everyone moved the same speed, jumped the same hight, started with the same guns. what this did was encourage teamwork to gain map control in order to attain the power weapons and thus win the game. players also had to change the way they played the game so they could make the most of what they had in order to get better instead of just changing their load out like in halo Reach. I am a cod player as well and the trap that COD falls into all the time is the thought that with every new release there has to be more perks and gun attachments and proficiencies and all that. Sometimes less is better. MW3 falls into this exact problem. infinity ward have become intent on replacing skill with perks. Look at COD4 there was not much to help the player at all. the player had to change their strategy in the long run more so than just changing their class. lets just look to forward to the return of the chief in halo 4 and hope that 343 industries does a good job. No Bloom Just a few of my thoughts Kenney 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoosterTeethFan Posted April 6, 2012 Report Share Posted April 6, 2012 i want it to be more like Halo 3 but still have some elements of Reach i think when we look back on Halo as a whole Reach will be the black sheep of Halo which means to say the one that was very different from the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upton889 Posted October 24, 2012 Report Share Posted October 24, 2012 Reach took a significantly less amount of skill too play. Bloom and the ranking system were half the problem along with armor abilities being unbalanced with almost no requirement of skill to use them. The number of people that came back to play the game is shown by the numbers. Sales may have been good but people didn't want to return to the game. Short term success? Yes, but definitely not in the long term. This topic has already been discussed several times. I'm ready to move on from Halo Reach and enjoy a higher quality experience in Halo 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.