Mr Muffins 7 Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 please comment and add your suggestion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullerpendragon Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 Definetely a hybrid of both in which it takes skill to reach the higher ranks rather lots and lots of playing grunt apocalypse and such. I still think they should keep the credit system since it was a great idea for buying armor but it shouldn't affect your leveling up. I'm not sure how halo 2's ranking system worked but apparently lots of people liked that so I would say halo 2's ranking system plus credits from halo reach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted August 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 i would like that, they would have to get new armor thoe or just update it, i hope they bring back hayabusa or rouge armor! i thought it was the best looking by far Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giofosho Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 Halo 2? you dont get level locked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haloboy Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 I want halo 3 matchmaking way of course.. Halo reach doesn't require any skills at all =s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Wolf07 Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 I want that ranked match feel in there where you need a certain rank to get to your overall rank, but at the same time less harsh. I hated going back a rank when my teammates sucked! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted August 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 I hat when that happend when playing rank team slayer, i couldnt get past 30 so i stared over and went to lone wolves which was much more successful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father B Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 Amalgam of the two. Perhaps they could divide a rank into grades that tell whether you're a n00b, skilled, or MLG material. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archangel Tyrael Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 Hybrid of both for sure, credits for winning and skill in game for armor(plus achievements for special pieces of armor like halo3). Level like the Halo3 winning system but you don't loose rank or anything, but only by quitting. and you loose ranked playlists by losing. My opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurt S-501 Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 i like the credit system for armor, but not for ranking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infam0usKidz Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 Halo 3 Ranking Experience. True Ranking is based on Skill. I think Armor should be bought through Credits. Why? I find it better this way. Even though there are no pros and only cons. Armor through Achievements? I don't really like the idea even though it is more suitable. Maybe as pre-requirements? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted August 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 i would like most armor to paid for in credits and have achievements more the best Armour like vidmasters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Snazzer Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 please comment and add your suggestion Halo reach is not fair with the credit system sometimes i get more credits when i lose! bungie should gave gave winning teams a 500 credit bouns , that would've made people get in teams and actually try to win. I think the system should be like this. If you win you get 500cr and then you get commnendation credits and the slot should work, not by luck, but by the games you win, the more u win and not quit the higher slot u get, that will also make people not quit and get in team and make halo a team game. reach is all about yourself, it doesnt matter if u win or loose cus u will still get about the same amount of credits. Along with the credits there should be experience point that will help you rank up, cus credits for rank is dumb. if you win you get 1 xp. if u loose u get none, kinda like halo 3. and yes, the 1-50 leveling system should be brought back, its not the perfect system but it is the best ranking system by far. You win 500cr,commendation credits,slot and 1 xp you lose 100cr,commendation credits,slot and no xp halo needs to be a game about skill again, if you want to buy armor play alot and get credits but real halo players that want to play hardcore and in a ranking system shouldn't just get credits to buy armor cus honestly i dont care about armor. the credits you wina re for armor and the skill and xp are for your rank, thats a perfect system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agent sensi foo Posted August 19, 2011 Report Share Posted August 19, 2011 i think that they should have something where your skill the the game determins the amount of credits you recieve. no more slot machine, completion bonus ext. you should get bonuses for each kill you get and each medal. i mean i really HATE to make halo anything like COD but i think that the cod exp could work for halo 4. where if you get a headshot, killing spree, multikills, ext. you get extra credits, and the credits are sitll how you would rank up. i think that this could work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinite LuLz Posted August 21, 2011 Report Share Posted August 21, 2011 I want a high ranked player to be a skilled player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phake Posted August 21, 2011 Report Share Posted August 21, 2011 Hi guys. In my opinion I think Halo 4's ranking system should be a combination of halo 2, halo 3 and halo: Reach. The credit system is nice. Buying new armor to make your guy look different is a big plus for replay value to some. Climbing the service ranks are also appealing to alot of players. I believe this should be kept the way it is or tweaked just a little here and there. With that being said there is the issue of not having independant ranks per playlist. Which I think is very important to a lot of people and I miss it a lot. Halo 2 had it closest to fair between itself and Halo 3. It should be on a consecutive win basis that you rank up. You have to win (x) amount of games to rank up or (x) amount of games in a row to rank up. To be fair winning a game against players who have a significantly better W/L ratio than you, should get you ranked up faster than the average player. Unfortunately this idea had its flaws and was abused, in Halo 3. Not only could you get to a 50 in under 50 games with a deranker on your team, but it also made players who started off as noobs unable to reclaim their deserved ranks. By that I mean that they ruin their win/loss ratio in the early stages of them playing and can no longer achieve a 50 in a playlist without the help of a deranker. Even if they have significantly increased their own personal skill level. In the end the important thing is to make sure that both new players and veterans are heard when making a new Halo. Matchmaking and campaign alike. I hope that Halo 4 is the best Halo we have seen since the second one. :] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 I really do and im sure 343 will come up with somthing great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batou Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 Definetely a hybrid of both in which it takes skill to reach the higher ranks rather lots and lots of playing grunt apocalypse and such. I still think they should keep the credit system since it was a great idea for buying armor but it shouldn't affect your leveling up. I'm not sure how halo 2's ranking system worked but apparently lots of people liked that so I would say halo 2's ranking system plus credits from halo reach. yeah dude u have a good point here. i loved halo 2 ranking halo 3 was goood 2 but i think bungie would do something new thats what should be done here combo of both or maybe something else new skill based Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean PHD Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 Even if you are really good but don't get to play very often you wind up playing with n00bs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Konshens Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 I think the credit system used for reach would be good to unlock armor and things, the ranking system used for halo 3 would be good to show what ranking you are, ex: commander, general etc. and a number level system (1-50) just like in halo 2 would be a perfect combination. The reason why I say 1-50 from halo 2 instead of halo 3 is because the halo 2's 1-50 system was much more difficult to get to 50, and if you went online (bungie.net)at the time now it'll either be here or somewhere else you could check your experience bar to determine how much more exp you need in order to go up to the next level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yah bono here Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 i think that when you win, you can get credits, say, up to 500 creds. nothing for losing, but the better you do, the more creds you get. firefight should have its own SEPERATE ranking system because part of the reason i stopped playing reach was because you saw nobles who were noobs and only used firefight to boost there rank. but in halo 3, you saw a 5-star general, you better have him on your team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted August 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2011 i liked that, i hope they dont have a separate rank for playlist, i hated that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dean the her0 Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 i think a true skill ranking system is needed for halo 4. there is no benefit from winning in reach but too much cheating in halo 3. i suggest a ranking system 1-50, 5 wins in a row to go up 5 loses in a row to go down. this way boosters quitters and restarters dont benefit. ppl with high xp go up the same as low xp ppl. bad teammates would only cost you your win streak and not your rank unless u already had a 4 lose streaks. this would also slow the time speed of getting a 50 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machinga Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 the halo 3 ranking system was so stupid, i would get matched with like level 40's when i was only level 20, match making has always cursed me, i had my friend play with my guy in a ranked match and he said it was 50 times harder than his player. On to the reach ranking system, my friend dropped his memory card in a bowl of water so he lost all his stuff, he did this 3 months ago, we were the same rank in reach until then, i have barely played much since, but he played so much he is a higher rank than me now. It should be your rank in a game combined with other ranks so if your teamates stink you dont get put down, combined with your stats in that game therefor if you were playing slayer and you had 5 kills and rank sergeant, and your teamates were privates and had 2 kills you would still get a good total score. here is the matrix. 5 points for winning 5 point for every kill -4 points for every death 6 points for every style kill -5 points for every style death -10 points for losing every ten points you have you gain a tier. 5 tiers in private rank 6 tiers in private grade 2. ect. ect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted September 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 it could work for more hardcore gamers but i cant see it with the typical casual gamer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.