MrPlow Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 i dont know how you could get it to work right but a hybrid could be a brilliant idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefSlayer Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Halo 3 style but instead of just having to win or lose the rating should still determine your skill. The worst was losing because of horrible teammates who went negative every time and never lvling up to 50 and stay at 49 forever -.- And reach sucks only cause they basically got rid of ranked games, made the arena, and then detroyed the arena with the way they split up the playlists and named them. They need to go back to ranked/unranked, and use the rating system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CandiBunni Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 I want halo 3 matchmaking way of course.. Halo reach doesn't require any skills at all =s Requires no skill at all? You know that's an absolute lie. I'd say it requires more skill than Halo 1, 2, and maybe even 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Biggles Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Halo 2 ranking system. nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocSpartanO07 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 How about something new that works better than both systems? Is everyone so narrow minded they can only think in terms of H2, H3, or Reach??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinite LuLz Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 i think a true skill ranking system is needed for halo 4. there is no benefit from winning in reach but too much cheating in halo 3. i suggest a ranking system 1-50, 5 wins in a row to go up 5 loses in a row to go down. this way boosters quitters and restarters dont benefit. ppl with high xp go up the same as low xp ppl. bad teammates would only cost you your win streak and not your rank unless u already had a 4 lose streaks. this would also slow the time speed of getting a 50 This is exactly what we need! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPlow Posted September 7, 2011 Report Share Posted September 7, 2011 i kinda like reach for that reason alone. its about the amount of time you put into the game, not necessarily how good you are. shows how much you actually like halo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted September 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 I like the halo 3 system because you needed skill to get promoted but i would like to see something new, change is sometimes good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
343industries Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Ranked playlists is the way 343 should go for Halo 4, but with a mix of Reach's rewarding system as well in my opinion, as far as it goes about the Armory etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simply Tom27 Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 I have to go with halo reach's ranking system as I got annoyed by a single xp point for winning, it just made the ranking up process feel less rewarding and more boring in my opinion, although I have to agree that winning teams should get much more credits than the losing team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Muffins 7 Posted September 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2011 with halo 3 i have a real urge to win because i know i will be rewarded and if i loose i gain nothing. with reach i really didnt care if i won or loss because you didnt really get a reward, maybe a few extra but not much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now