l mj l Posted June 27, 2011 Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 As long as there's hardly a difference in accuracy between ADS and nonADS shooting I think it'd be fine. If it was a preference thing you know? If shooting ADS gives an advantage then camping will be much more common, and I really think that's a negative. It all depends on how it's done. I just don't want gameplay to slow down any. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skummgummigubbe Posted June 27, 2011 Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 NOO ADS it will ruin the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafter Posted June 27, 2011 Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 Sorry, but if there is ADS 4 will end up like Reach, it won't feel like Halo. Find away to keep the original feel with ADS and I'm all for it. 343 should put it in a beta. But if they do that, and lose the Halo feel it becomes Call of Duty: Future Warfare. I, and most everyone who still loves and/or plays Halo, HATES COD. We can't stand flank, camp, and more flank gameplay. -He who does not punish evil commands it to be done. -Leonardo DaVinci As long as there's hardly a difference in accuracy between ADS and nonADS shooting I think it'd be fine. If it was a preference thing you know? If shooting ADS gives an advantage then camping will be much more common, and I really think that's a negative. It all depends on how it's done. I just don't want gameplay to slow down any. No; it will not look like COD (COD wasn't the inventor of ADS), it will look like every other game, but better, because of the story (the setting and the year) and the quantity of vehicles and usable spaces (from land to space), meanig, Halo's potential. The idae of ADS is exacly to have more accuracy whila ADS'ing, just like you'd do in real life. Can you explain what do you mean with:We can't stand flank, camp, and more flank gameplay, please; Rafter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starshot36 Posted June 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 My personal opinion is it should be used for aesthetic reasons, i only posted this topic to merely see other peoples ideas, not to see people slugging it out. If i am honest i just thought this because i have never seen the point of putting sights on the gun if you can't use them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starshot36 Posted June 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 As long as there's hardly a difference in accuracy between ADS and nonADS shooting I think it'd be fine. If it was a preference thing you know? If shooting ADS gives an advantage then camping will be much more common, and I really think that's a negative. It all depends on how it's done. I just don't want gameplay to slow down any. again i completely agree with what you are saying i just think it should be an option not a necessity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaliper Posted June 27, 2011 Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 NO! this is halo, if you want Aiming down sights go to call of duty. Otherwise stay classic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireDragons Posted June 27, 2011 Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 Such a thing really has no purpose in a Halo game since they already have the gun's sights linked up to your heads up display and you have a digital zoom (which in other games is what they use this feature for - either crosshair or zoom). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle K Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 No, no, a thousand times no and if they do it wont be halo and I will look down with some shame upon that...creation "Yes, yes, a thousand times yes" It will not be the classic Halo, it will be better and more people will buy it; If you want to play classic Halo you can play all the previous games, and you will alreaady have Halo CEA, you don't need one more Keep opening you mind , Rafter go play COD most people buy halo because they DONT want to play COD and adding ADS would make it too much like COD they already added armor abilities making it like perks so ADS would be Terrible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delevdos Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 No, no, a thousand times no and if they do it wont be halo and I will look down with some shame upon that...creation "Yes, yes, a thousand times yes" It will not be the classic Halo, it will be better and more people will buy it; If you want to play classic Halo you can play all the previous games, and you will alreaady have Halo CEA, you don't need one more Keep opening you mind , Rafter NO NO NO, a thousand times no. i bye Halo games to play Halo not COD or any other FPS out there. If they add this in It just wont be Halo any more, besides they may gain a few new people but they will loose the trust and faith of the core halo community NO NO NO NO, a million times no! The halo franchise has been known as a Non-ADS shooter since the very first concept. To add the feature of ADS would be corrupting the structural integrity of Halo as a whole. Many other franchises have followed in all others paths by using the ADS system, but Halo is its own system of FPS. If the ADS system is added to Halo the you might as well title it Call of Duty: Halo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocSpartanO07 Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Any of you children ever fire a real assault rifle? In Combat situations? I have. Any of you that think COD is realistic are idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafter Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 So what is realistic, then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocSpartanO07 Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 So what is realistic, then? Not COD and not Halo. they are just two different gamesplay styles. I preffer Halo, but play COD when my friends ask me to. What is realistic? thats a funny question. Playing COD and engaging enemies in real life is like saying Forza 3 is realistic when you have never driven a real car. People tend to beat these subjects to death. Its a matter of preferance. Halo not having ADS is what makes it Halo. COD is no more realistic than Halo, just different. If every FPS played like COD then we would have no real choice anymore. Having a choice is what makes being a gamer great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafter Posted June 29, 2011 Report Share Posted June 29, 2011 Ok, Understand your point. Though, we're not talking about the gamers here. Rather about the game. If we were thinking about the best for the gamers, the threads would be much different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EW SNIP3DOWN Posted June 29, 2011 Report Share Posted June 29, 2011 NO IF THEY ADD ADS IT WILL SUCK ******COUCK! IF 343I MAKES ADS TO HALO THEY CAN GO **** THEMSELFS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafter Posted June 29, 2011 Report Share Posted June 29, 2011 It seems that people more conservatists haven't read this thread:http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=452 (PS: follow the instructions on the top of the first post) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reaverh311 Posted June 29, 2011 Report Share Posted June 29, 2011 NO we don't wont COD we want Halo you know the good game us halo players rape Cod Noobs and eat them for snacks (taste like ****** bag) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BraverKING514 Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 NO NO and NO. ADS is hated by the Halo community, and it wouldn't work well with shields and the classic weapons. Ads will destroy Halo. :thumbdown: If they use other elements of gameplay and top all others they wouldn't need ADS. Keep Halo HALO!!!! Thanks BraverKING514 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CsDarKnight Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 Oh God! No, please no! NOOOO! Ontopic: Why do you think Spartans have a reticle and the HUD? WE DON'T NEED ADS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snipers Recon Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 ADS, or Aiming Down Sight for people who don't know, has never been in a Halo game before. Should 343i include it in a next-gen Halo or should they leave Halo without ADS? Post your ideas here. god yes. i want that so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machinga Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 Most guns in Halo dont have iron sights Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JrH_154 Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 CoD jokes aside (honestly, just shut up if your only critisism is "THIS ISN'T COD GET OUT OF HERE COD NOOB!"), this really wouldn't work in Halo, both gameplay-wise and canonically. Halo has always been known for its fast-paced, frantic gameplay. You're constantly strafing around your target, jumping to make you harder to hit, etc. In most games, ADS comes at the cost of movement; your look speed is slowed and movement is brought down to a snail's pace. Even if 343i made it so movement wasn't hindered, the weapons function in such a way that ADS is still unnecessary. Ever since Combat Evolved, the weapons of Halo have been simple to use: you point and shoot. Variables such as accuracy have been built around this foundation as well. If you want to go one step beyond, most UNSC weapons, and virtually all Covenant weapons have no iron sights. This is because of actual HUDs that are used by soldiers in either faction. The Heads Up Display that you see when playing? That's not just there for convinence, that's actually what Master Chief sees. Now, ADS would still have benefits, as long as the concept itself is handled correctly. Bioshock is a perfect example of Halo-like gameplay that features ADS, albeit not prominently. In those instances where you would rather trust your own aim than the reticule, it does actually work quite well. For those not in the know, Bioshock & its sequel work clicking the right stick (in Halo this zooms in) to toggle between ADS & normal view. It actually fits the gameplay very well. To be perfectly honest, I would not mind seeing something similar included in a Halo game. Actually, I'd prefer to aim down my gun's "sights" than enter that stupid binocular zoom mode. There are pros and cons to this. Really, it's hit-or-miss at best. For the time being it would make for a nice experiment. The Halo community is unforgiving when it comes to keeping the series distinct and separate from its competitors. Is ADS crossing the line? Maybe. Would it fit with Halo's gameplay? Probably not. Would I welcome the change? Absolutely. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minuette Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 No, the way the halo guns are made, its impossible, plus master chief is a badA, he dosent need to aim down sites like a loser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sly-tendencies Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 ADS is a horrible idea in Halo, and I doubt 343 will see much success if they put it in any of their new games. People are already giving them mean looks (including me) for adding Promethean Vision, because it seems like a waste of an ability space once you get sort of familiar with maps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shado12 lol Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 no no no no no no no no no and just once more NO! that would be ware i draw the line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undead Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 No, the way the Visors work iron sights would not be necessary for Spartans. Everything you see on the HUD like the grenades, ammo, radar, health, shield, cross hair, etc is what the Spartan is seeing through his visor. So its not necessary. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.