Delpen9

DriverRettro's smarter than all of you.

I didn't vote for you. I know how to handle players whom hide behind logic.

You're more likely to find answer by ignoring that list. Let's assume the list is random: you'll need a copious number of tests before you come to a false pattern -- that won't help you discern any else -- or assume that it's false; also notice that if the mafians are written in as pro-townians (which would be a guess), that only helps you by the mathematical equation (pro-townians - mafians - dead players=suspicious players). Just for the sake of your claims, it works but becomes superseded by observing the players' actions. The best way to test your theories would be to kill the purported mafians on the list, but that would be heedless, which you aren't.

Why are you so caught up on something that would be better off forgotten? I'm starting to think this's an inside job to confuse pro-town. Jeez, that list holds no relevance.

rrHuntington might be mafian, but I don't have any clear evidence that TD or Bnus are innocent; both Bnus and TD are busy. It's better to kill the least active players, but steamrolling through those two would be a mistake.

We need the detective to identify Centurion, so he won't die next time he's on the suspect list.

Centurion hasn't done anything to make himself a mafian.

Axilus keeps things logical and keeps in mind a wide array of possibilites. While it's not optimal, it's more effective than what rrHuntington and Selfie did.

I understand why you might think anyone who voted for Peanut is a mafian. Rhuuntingotn was the clear choice. You and The Director were ignored -- allowing you to posit that the mafians wanted to focus their votes on 1 person -- so they focused their votes on the pro-townian. This is a good predictor, but it doesn't take a couple things into account: enough pro-townians voted for Peanut that it wasn't needed, which would make more sense as to why you and TD were ignored; and the mafians eluded you by voting Rhuuntington.

That's too much of a stretch.

I'd rather have Rhuuntington dead. Unease hasn't been playing.

Ledgend lost two votes during Centurion and my vote change.

Unease Peanut and Bnus haven't done much of anything, while Rhuuntington has.

You don't need a reason to vote Rhuuntington. Look at what he's said.

I change my vote to Rhunntington.

I didn't know you were 'familia' with that.

Bnus was being gee.

Early PMs are meant to extract information from players early on. Inversely, him not PMing you shows that he's less than likely a mafian. Mafians pick at those they think have pro-town roles while remaining unsuspected. Pro-town PMs often start around the 2nd-3rd lynching.

For some reason I'm NEVER a mafian. The current pro-town PM is only for those in the first suspect list. It's too early for all a' that. Even if the previous games have any bearing on your current role, it would be in favor of your previous role: as cited by many of the players.

I think you were blushing when you wrote this. Confirmed mafian.

yes

I vote Ledgend1221. Mafians: Butch (voted Rhunntingtn out of the blue) Ledgend1221 (he's replying to Blake more than usual) (smart enough to make a plan like this) Blake (what was said was reverse psychology) (the mafians thinks he has a role) Ledgend is smart enough to make an elaborate plan like this. Blake has been absent, and Ledgend and Butch can be seen as more careful and considerate. Destruct isn't voting Rhuntington so he's unlikely. He's the only one that's voted Ledgend, well... besides Ledgend.

YOU WANT ME TO DIE!

Anyone who uses the list to complicate the game is a mafian.

BZ1 intermittently inserted mafians into seemingly random places. There prob. won't b a use fr that list later in the game.