Amik28 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 I cant believe from what i hear the halo reach rank system is coming back. The reason i stopped playin that game was because kids that would get 5 kills a game would still be a higher rank than me just because they play 8 hours a day. The 1-50 rank system made the games much more intense because something was actually on the line, my rank. Im just disapointed and debating buying the game. I was wondering if anyone else felt the same? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth Pilot Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 If you want to see our opinions, search for the other 20 threads about this. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amik28 Posted August 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 Sorry dont have the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedStarRocket91 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 If you want to see our opinions, search for the other 20 threads about this. That really does sum things up perfectly. Sorry dont have the time You have the time to write a paragraph, but not to type a few words into the search bar? I'll summarise for you. Some people like it, some people don't, and in the end provided the TrueSkill ranking system is doing its job it doesn't make any difference whatsoever. If the TrueSkill system isn't working, then it still makes no difference as that's what searches for players are based on. The 1-50 system is a representation of where you fit in the TrueSkill rankings. The cR system in Reach shows how long you've played. The system for finding other players has been the same since Halo 2, which was the first game to use it. So just because it was represented in a different way in Reach, doesn't actually mean it was a different system. Anyway, there's nothing wrong with making a new topic, but this really HAS been discussed to death, and beyond - and then some - and then some more. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steamroller Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 I cant believe from what i hear the halo reach rank system is coming back. The reason i stopped playin that game was because kids that would get 5 kills a game would still be a higher rank than me just because they play 8 hours a day. The 1-50 rank system made the games much more intense because something was actually on the line, my rank. Im just disapointed and debating buying the game. I was wondering if anyone else felt the same? I agree with you. The 1-50 ranks were way better. I am still getting Halo 4 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryu♥Hayabusa Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 It is a hybrid of Halo 3 and Reach. It is XP driven, and you may be able to rank down for doing bad. All I know is, it is definitely more accurate than the flawed system you love so much. /thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorB77 Posted August 11, 2012 Report Share Posted August 11, 2012 Sorry dont have the time I was going to respond to your OP. But I dont have the time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaxx Posted August 11, 2012 Report Share Posted August 11, 2012 That really does sum things up perfectly. You have the time to write a paragraph, but not to type a few words into the search bar? I'll summarise for you. Some people like it, some people don't, and in the end provided the TrueSkill ranking system is doing its job it doesn't make any difference whatsoever. If the TrueSkill system isn't working, then it still makes no difference as that's what searches for players are based on. The 1-50 system is a representation of where you fit in the TrueSkill rankings. The cR system in Reach shows how long you've played. The system for finding other players has been the same since Halo 2, which was the first game to use it. So just because it was represented in a different way in Reach, doesn't actually mean it was a different system. Anyway, there's nothing wrong with making a new topic, but this really HAS been discussed to death, and beyond - and then some - and then some more. Love those links Rocket XD You found the time I assume ;D 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ll Kold Posted August 11, 2012 Report Share Posted August 11, 2012 I seriously hope they bring in a better ranking system in the future. Not necessarily at launch but shortly after. I remember playing competitively to rank up and if our team lost we'd lose a rank as well. I WANT THAT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedStarRocket91 Posted August 11, 2012 Report Share Posted August 11, 2012 Love those links Rocket XD You found the time I assume ;D You know me! If it's worth doing, it's worth doing in style Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaxx Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 You know me! If it's worth doing, it's worth doing in style You sir, deserve a medal for those efforts 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now