EvilSniper454 Posted May 5, 2012 Report Share Posted May 5, 2012 I personally like halo reach and halo 3 in their own ways tell me what you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveAtStateFarm Posted May 5, 2012 Report Share Posted May 5, 2012 I like Halo 3 more because you had a bit more freedom in the campaign, and the multiplayer never got boring, The campaign as more colorful too. You also had a taste of exploration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZB-85 Posted May 5, 2012 Report Share Posted May 5, 2012 This is put in the wrong Forum, it should go here: Halo - 343Industries Community Forum Welcome to the Forum by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donut Posted May 5, 2012 Report Share Posted May 5, 2012 Thread needs to be moved. But, I will say Halo 3. For it's amazing Campaign, Elite and Spartan Customization, better maps like Sandtrap, Guardian and Valhalla, and most of all: It's Ranking System. Halo Reach was good for it's large Selection of Armory, but lacked great and classic maps, also was very different to Halo 3. CR Ranking System, so you can rank up even if you lose or AFK, short Campaign but was good, and I really liked the new Forge with the new "Edit Coordinates," even though Forge World was the only place worth Forging good maps. Overall, I say Halo 3. It just had a more, Halo feel. You just hop right on it, join your friends and have a blast. This is all just my opinion, people have different opinions. Halo 4 is looking to be a mix of both Reach and Halo 3. So were all good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now