Jump to content

Kiing 0f Coffe

Trusted Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    353

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Kiing 0f Coffe

  3. Breaking down the type of Forum users that argue balance.

    in Halo 4

    Posted

    DMR- Nothing wrong with it, yes it does seem a little OP at times but it fills the role of a DMR, just like the BR, Carbine, AR, and LR fit certain roles

     

    Boltshot- Its a shotgun/pistol it can be charged to one hit someone at close range. But other than that the weapons is as useful as a plasma pistol when i comes to shooting something, i suggest a nerf on range

     

    Playlist- I think 343i needs to add more playlist, it would add much more thinks to do when you not in a party

     

    Spartan Ops- Its not cheating it was added in the game on purpose

     

    Spec Codes- 343i messed up but they are working on getting the codes to people over the weekend 12-14 to 12-17

     

    These is common things i see and this is my input on them, all in all i think 343 made a game just as good as bungie could

     

    DigitalVirus out :)

    Argue balance in the other threads plz K thanks Bye

     

    Firstly, a perfectionist is someone who isn't happy unless something is exactly right; that is pretty much the exact opposite of what you define.

     

    Secondly, it makes you look like you can't make a coherent point when you make an argument (the evidence suggests x is OP) then say you're not going to 'bring the argument' immediately afterwards. As a general rule suggesting that 'evidence' supports your point is a terrible debating technique if there isn't compelling and widely accepted evidence.

    Well what else am I going to call the people who think everything in Halo 4 is perfect? Again, I'm open to suggestions. Does any evidence support the DMR isn't OP? Of course! When I made the perfectionist part, I made it in the perspective in the other groups. The reason I don't want to bring the argument here is because I'm and a lot of other people are arguing the exact same things in other threads. It would be pointless to argue about it here, if you wanna take a stab at my opinions on balance, do it in the threads I'm arguing in.

  5. Breaking down the type of Forum users that argue balance.

    in Halo 4

    Posted

    Ok, if you get offended because someone on the internet puts you in a group then don't read this thread. In the comments below, I don't wanna see "I'M TOTALLY NOT LIKE THAT!" No I'm not going to be mentioning names, you know who you are. Ok first we're gonna hit on the majority. The " Butt Hurt Ones". These include the people with five posts for the first day and then never post again because they are done complaining. These include quotes like " TAKE THAT **** DMR OUT OF THE GOSH DARN GAME! OMG I ONLY WANT THE BR IN THIS GAME! THE GAME SUCKS CAUSE OF THE DMR!" I agree the DMR is broken but you can't take it out of the game.

    The "Butt Hurt Ones" Normally get mad cause they get killed by the gun a few times in a single game then come on to the forums to complain about that gun. Now, lets hit the "Purists" these are the people who wants halo 3 remakes every time a halo game comes out. Halo 3 is great I assure you but we would REALLY be copying COD if we made the same game over and over and over. The game has evolved, Halo 4 shouldn't be any of the other halo games, it should be Halo 4. Purist quotes a lot of the times are the following, "Armour abilities shouldn't be in the game OMG! Why are there perks!? Why are there FREAGEN LOAD OUTS! WE SHOULD ONLY START WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE AND A PISTOL OMG!" As you can tell, dealing with Purists is annoying, again, you know who you are.

    Now we have 343s personal shields. The " Perfectionists". These guys think everything in all of Halo 4 is 100% perfect. These commonly include the people who like the DMR and the Boltshot even though evidence supports they are both OP. I'm not going to bring the argument here and you guys won't either. There are already other forums burning with hatred towards each other. I'm sure someone reading this is probably like " OMG YOUR BEING SO MEAN PUTTING US IN GROUPS THAT SOUND BAD!" I remember lots of Perfectionist forums calling the others names like " The Nerf Squad" And making us all sound like dirty devil people who have no idea what they are talking about. Again, I'm insulting all of the groups, even the one I fall under. Here are some Perfectionist quotes " ADAPT YOU IDIOTS OMG THE BOLTSHOT HAS LIMITED RANGE SO JUST FREAKEN ADAPT OMFG THE DMR DESERVES TO BE BETTER EVEN THOUGH THE LIGHTRIFLE HAS LESS AIM ASSIST BUT THE DMR IS STILL BETTER!"

     

    The next group are the ones that put reason into there posts. Show some respect to this group, it's hard to get in here. Of course, I view myself as right and only trying to balance the game, but I could be wrong and I (you guys also) am too stubborn to admit it. There are some people in this group, so show your respect.

     

    I hope you guys enjoyed this post and attempt to identify the people and the groups they belong in. If you think I left out anything about these groups or a whole entire other group then please, let me know. Thank you for your time to read this post. Have a merry Christmas!

    • Like 2

  8. You are forced to use explosives.... That's bad

    in Halo 4

    Posted

    I support this stupid perk :)

     

    I don't see to much of a difference. I just use it because I am a decent made thrower

    I support this stupid perk :)

     

    I don't see to much of a difference. I just use it because I am a decent made thrower

    Do you know what this perk does? It says, "Use me! Or else your nades will be crap". And it says," Use me! Or else you will be nuked!" (What is with this double quoting thing?)You probably don't see the difference because everyone is using it.

  9. You are forced to use explosives.... That's bad

    in Halo 4

    Posted

    This perk is forced on you. Since everyone uses it, it is a must have on all of your classes. Not only does it increase grenade effectiveness, but it makes grenades less effective against you. If you don't use the perk, then your grenades are useless and you can get nuked by frags. The perk itself is bad design and must be removed. There is no tweaking that can be done to help make this perk balanced. If it is removed, then they should not add a perk that also makes grenades better or worse. Because, then we would have to use one of those perks. It would be like the Juggernaut and stopping power perks in COD 4. You would have to use one or the other. If anyone supports this stupid perk, then let me know in the comments below.

×
×
  • Create New...