Jump to content

IceMan

Trusted Members
  • Posts

    185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by IceMan

  1. Despite being similar, they're both very different games, especially when it comes to tempo, Left 4 Dead is a fast paced game whilst Dead Island is much slower, instead of going in guns blazing, its best to take note of what weapons you ave available and what condition they're in before going head to head with a horde, its more realistic in that sense too, if you are playing alone and you come across 6-8 Zombies, its quite difficult to make it out alive whereas in left 4 dead you can take down 30 Zombies in seconds, so in my opinion Dead Island is better in terms of realism and Strategy, but if you want something quicker and more chaotic, then Left 4 Dead is better. It all depends on what your preference is though. I see Dead Island as being a cross between Dawn of the Dead and The Walking Dead, so if your a fan of those epecially, i would recommend it, but i'd still wait untill its lowered in price slightly and they've released the first patch for the console version, after that, its a must buy! lol

  2. It is, as long as you dont mind alot of running back and forth, most of the missions are things like go here and get this, then bring it back type stuff lol It weighs heavily on co-op, but thats better off with someone you know so the games played fairly otherwise random people can steal the things from a box you opened if your not quick enough. So far though, i've done a bulk of it alone and it does add extra intensity to it, i look down certain street and see packs of 7-8 Zombies and i instantly try to find an alternative less packed route just to survive, and overall the game is very addictive, i would recommend it to anyone who loves rpg's and if they happen to like stomping on zombie's heads at the same time too, well thats just even better lol

  3. MW3 your certain of 2 things. 1 is cracking campaign story. 2 Shoddy/samey online experience

     

    I agree, they built Modern Warfare 3 using exactly the same engine the did Modern Warfare 2 with, all it basically is, is new locations and a couple extra bits on weapons and things, theres not really anything new there for me to fork out full price, i'd rather wait until i can get it on sale! Instead, im buying Battlefield 3, they built the new frostbite engine to make it and the visuals are some of the best i've seen in any fps, plus with the added vehicles it looks like it could be utter chaos at times, which makes it more fun and appealing to me. And the best thing about it is, its almost impossible for people to camp, you find a camper in a building, just blow up the building, no camper and no place for him to run back to and do it again lol

  4. It would be nice if everyone could just sign a non-aggresion pact, war is pointless! Has anyone in history ever really succeded in bringing about any good from war? To my recollection, the ony decent thing was the Romans bringing things like reading, writing, roads and things like that to other countries, but even they were forced out in the end.

  5. I think the point of removing Bloom is mainly to shut alot of people up lol but at the same times, it'll cause all of those people to actually feel like they have to aim at the person to kill them, i've spent alot of time in theater to gather clips for video's and the amount of times i've seen people getting killed while the reticule has been to the side of the person is rediculous, either bullet spread is too much (which i doubt) or they're using an aimbot, either way, with no bloom, the reticule cant expand and thats gonna cause alot more people to seek accuracy, rather than just shooting the gun within the reticules radius and scoring the kill. But at the end of the day, you can only tell somebody your opinion, its up to actually playing the TU before anyone knows for sure whats gonna happen, seeing is believing apparently.

×
×
  • Create New...