Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Crysis 3 graphics compared to Halo 4 and GOW 3


Adam91

Crysis-3-4.jpg

 

Thought that Halo 4 or Gears of war 3 had the best graphics? Well think again as they might be getting kicked of their throne as Crysis 3 may be taking the lead.

 

More details below

 

Source:

Examiner

 

 

In an interview with VideoGamer on Tuesday, Cevat Yerli talked a little bit about the graphics of the upcoming multiplatform title, “Crysis 3.” The CEO of Crytek boasts that no other Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 video game, not even “Halo” or “Gears of War,” look as good technically as the first-person shooter on consoles.

 

 

"No game will ever look technically better than Crysis 3 on these consoles, flat out. Most games are not even anywhere near Crysis 2 technically. I'm not talking about art style – art is subjective – but the pure fact of what we have been cramming in with Crysis 2 on Xbox [360] and PlayStation [3], I've yet to see a game do that still today.

 

Any day I will take a battle against Gears and Halo, whatever, the amount of data we put in and the detail level is far superior. With Crysis 3 we're pushing that to another level, but the PC is just two levels beyond."

 

 

“Crysis 3” is currently being developed by Crytek Frankfurt, the same studio responsible for the previous games in the series in addition to the original “Far Cry.” Crytek UK (previously known as Free Radical Design, the studio behind “Haze” and “TimeSplitters”) worked on the multiplayer portion of the video game.

 

“Crysis 3” is slated to come out for the PC, Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 platforms in North America on Feb. 19, 2013. You can pre-order the first-person shooter in the following link: “Crysis 3”

Sign in to follow this  


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



Crysis 2 had superior graphics to GoW and Halo 4, not sure what the article author was thinking...

 

Crysis 3 is using an improved version of Cryengine, version 3.4.3...no pun intended there...that is the actual version number now..lmao. Crysis 3 will be hard to beat at any time, or even any version of Cryengine for that matter. The only engine that can compete or even start to beat it out is UDK.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

The graphics for crisis are very good but that just doesn't make the game. The story mode for them are really bad I went trough the whole crisis 2 expecting more from the story but I just could not get into it.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

The campaign in crysis 3 is confusing and the driving level was terrible. The driving sensitivity is so bad. The halo 4 graphics are better did you see the prologue the people were so detailed 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some words of enlightment for everyone: No PC Game released today needing today's latest video card (I don't keep up with it anymore, but it must be the NVidia 680?), will look better than MGS Ground Zeroes on Xbox 360 and Ps3, with their 2006 and 2007 hardware, using Fox Engine. You thought CryEngine was so advanced? Think again. I remember when the makers of Crysis said Crysis 1 would never be on Xbox and PS3 because they couldn't handle those graphics, and we saw Crysis 1 come out on Xbox after Crysis 2 came out on Xbox, looking practically as good as the PC Version, and now Crysis 3 is here looking light years ahead of Crysis 1 on PC. I don't know what all the fuss about Crysis graphics were back then in 2008. I own an Alienware laptop from 2008 with a 9800GTX card and it was able to max out Crysis on Very High back in 2008 at over 720p with a 30+ Framerate most of the time, and I considered many Xbox 360 and Ps3 games to look better, including Gears of War and Metal Gear Solid 4(except for its crappy textures and odd character animation). As you can see I stayed with my 2008 Alienware laptop and haven't bought a new one since then (having the money) and simply switched to console gaming. I did this after I saw Crysis 2 come out on PC, and it looked better than Crysis 1, my Alienware 2008 Laptop was still able to max it out at high resolutions with a better framerate than Crysis 1, so I decided that PC game developers are just not efficient using the hardware available. I have a desktop computer with an NVidia 280GTX that I bought around the time Skyrim came out to be able to max it out, but I haven't bought anything after that card and no longer game on the computer, and Skyrim looks just as good on consoles, and more recently Dead Space 3. It doesn't make sense having to upgrade your video card every year and your processor every 2 for the minimal advances PC games make in graphics, but the insane requirements they seem to artificially bump probably to make you buy more expensive hardware. If I was going to keep up with PC Gaming, I would have had to buy a new Alienware Laptop every 3 years to be able to max out the latest games. When it comes to Xbox and Ps3, I just bought each console once for less than one fourth the cost of the Alienware laptop, and they are still going after 7(Xbox) and 6(Ps3) years. By the way, don't look as Halo 4 as the best graphics among all consoles and PC, simply look at 343 Industries and their work. Compare Halo 4 to Halo 3, ODST, Halo Reach and Halo Anniversary, 343 is light years ahead of Bungie when it comes to graphics. I have no doubt Halo 5 on the next Xbox will look just as good as MGS5/Ground Zeroes, if not better due to being on a new console. I still cant believe how amazing Ground Zeroes look on Ps3 and Xbox 360: It would be amazing just if it was Ps4 or Next Xbox, so I have no idea what would Hideo Kojima be able to pull off on the next consoles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5IVOs5Pxh8

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Nikita Orgjanski

Posted

Crysis 3 has the best graphics the world has ever seen since the invention of computers.I played it on PC the game is fantastic .Not even fantastic is enough to say about crytek's masterpiece .All those who hate the crysis franchise or only crysis 3 GO TO HELL!!!

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Dzvezdan Cacanoski

Posted

I totally agree with you Nikita Orgjanski.I bought for 5000 macedonian denars or 103 US dollars.It required a DX11 graphics card but i bought that too for 1800 macedonian denars .Even though this has cost me 20 percent of month salary i am a huge fan of the game

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Avram Turmakoski

Posted

Halo 4 is nice but it's story is so much far away in the future crysis franchise is much closer .Thumbs up for crysis 3 i'm a huge fan of it. I'ts graphics are the best. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Leonid Chubrinoski

Posted

No other game has DX11 graphics . I don't understand why those metacritic or other aggregating score websites give scores over 90 for stupid games like tomb raider [2013] or metal gear or anything that is so stupid .Why don't they give a 100\100 rating for all four crysis games when they have have the best graphics ,story and everything else.The Crysis franchise has everything that is the best .NANOSUIT 2.0 CAN TAKE DOUBLE ANYTHING MJOLNIR VII CAN!!!

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Vojdan Radevski

Posted

Crysis 3 is absolutely the best game the world has ever seen .I don't know what to say it's the best .I would rate it 100\100.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Avram Turmakoski

Posted

Hmm.You sound familiar to me .Not that you are a crysis fan but you may have origins from Modrich ,Struga ,Macedonia?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...