Toggle shoutbox 343i Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Halo 4 "join in progress games" idea.
#1
Posted 06 May 2012 - 11:55 PM
We should have "Quick match". A playlist where you can find faster games and join in progress games and leave whenever.
Also there should be "Ranked match". Rank matched is for more competitive style gameplay. You can not find games that are already in progress and if you leave will suffer a huge exp penalty.
I know this is just a small little topic. I just wanted to post my idea.
If you guys want to add more detail onto this idea go ahead. Mainly what i made this topic for anyways, to discuss this. I could see Quickmatch having a exp reduction too but i don't know.
#2
Posted 06 May 2012 - 11:58 PM
Both have one or two seperate playlists that are quick join, and the others be the classic, be bored and wait.
-King of Azaxxinations-


#3
Posted 07 May 2012 - 12:01 AM
I just want, socail and ranked playlists.
Both have one or two seperate playlists that are quick join, and the others be the classic, be bored and wait.
So have quick match option for both of them? That seems good, also i think quick matches should have no leader board stats just a fun quickmatch haha. Ranked should be leaderboard matches. Be a good way to see who is better than the other.
#4
Posted 07 May 2012 - 01:41 AM
#5
Posted 07 May 2012 - 03:14 AM
#7
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:33 AM
But if it's in a social playlist, does it matter? I am completely for a join in progress system implemented into a social playlist, but I still say Ranked should be the good old stand by of waiting. How else are you going to match up against people appropriately?i dont like it much, i dont want to be joining games were the score difference is huge or the games about to end and get but on the losing team. happens to me all the time on CoD
#8
Posted 07 May 2012 - 10:22 AM
#9
Posted 07 May 2012 - 11:49 AM

"Each one of these souls is finite and precious. And I'm close. Close to saving them all." -The Librarian
2nd Member to reach 4000 posts - 12/16/12

#11
Posted 07 May 2012 - 04:53 PM
#12
Posted 07 May 2012 - 05:16 PM
"The best kind of weapon is the weapon you only have to fire once." - Tony Stark

#13
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:38 PM
#14
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:42 PM
#15
Posted 07 May 2012 - 07:51 PM
#16
Posted 07 May 2012 - 08:08 PM
well id rather not want an xp loss because what if there is something urgent going on and you have to leave a match or what if your power goes out?Well all i need to say is i support this but, i hope it isn't just join in like call of duty.
We should have "Quick match". A playlist where you can find faster games and join in progress games and leave whenever.
Also there should be "Ranked match". Rank matched is for more competitive style gameplay. You can not find games that are already in progress and if you leave will suffer a huge exp penalty.
I know this is just a small little topic. I just wanted to post my idea.
If you guys want to add more detail onto this idea go ahead. Mainly what i made this topic for anyways, to discuss this. I could see Quickmatch having a exp reduction too but i don't know.
#17
Posted 07 May 2012 - 08:26 PM
Exactly my opinion, it should be an option to quick join, not mandatory. Enough people will use the feature that it will work, and the traditionalists will be happy as well. Personally, I've done some of my best work when it's me against 4 others.I just want, socail and ranked playlists.
Both have one or two seperate playlists that are quick join, and the others be the classic, be bored and wait.
#18
Posted 08 May 2012 - 12:22 AM
i dont dislike the idea, i just dont want it to effect my win/loss ratio. it did in CoD which means you get put againts people with the same "skill" as you by going by your win/loss ratio, which puts good players against bad players (no offence if your a bad player)But if it's in a social playlist, does it matter? I am completely for a join in progress system implemented into a social playlist, but I still say Ranked should be the good old stand by of waiting. How else are you going to match up against people appropriately?
#19
Posted 08 May 2012 - 06:25 AM
i dont dislike the idea, i just dont want it to effect my win/loss ratio. it did in CoD which means you get put againts people with the same "skill" as you by going by your win/loss ratio, which puts good players against bad players (no offence if your a bad player)
If it's tracking your Win/Loss ratio in social, then it's a fail on 343's part. Social is just that, social. You could match up against a brand spanking new recruit, you could match up against a 5 star general, it doesn't matter because the game is just for fun. In a ranked setting, where Win/Loss ratio's should matter, there shouldn't be an option for a Join In Progress just for that reason.
#20
Posted 08 May 2012 - 07:44 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














