Jump to content

Do You Think Halo 5 Would Have Been Recieved Better If It Were A Spinoff? (YouTube Video)


Lordpyromon

Recommended Posts

A turd's a turd however you may look at it. The only good thing out of being a spinoff would be that Halo (no 5): Guardians wouldn't of derailed the mainline games because of not being a numbered title (if in this alternate timeline Halo games even get numbers anymore).

 

If they still had the same writing team working on this hypothetical spinoff the story would still be as bad as OG 5's. Also, in this timeline Guardians would constantly be compared to Reach, and would be unanimously considered a worse game than Reach (like I already consider it) because of Guardians' lack of offline modes, split-screen, complex player customization, and up-to-par Campaign.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is where we disagree. Reach is my 2nd favorite Halo game (campaign wise). Ranked order best to worst...

 

Campaign: ODST>Reach>CE>H2>H3>H4>H5

 

Multiplayer: H3/H2>Reach>CE>H4>H5

 

The amount of sheer disdain I have for 343 and their creative ability goes far beyond anything I have ever had for a franchise developer in the past. However, SD would be correct, the writing team just plain sucks. A spin off would have been in the same pool as H5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...